By Pietro Pazzi
Most leadership transitions are described from the outside.
- A new role.
- A larger mandate.
- A bigger team.
- More complexity.
- More visibility.
- More pressure.
But the transition that really matters often happens underneath all of that.
It is the inner transition — the moment when the leader begins to realise that the identity which brought them here may not be able to take them further.
This is where Jung’s work, especially the world that emerges through The Red Book, becomes surprisingly relevant to modern leadership. Not because leaders need to become Jungian scholars, but because Jung gives us a language for something many senior leaders experience but cannot easily name.
A leader may come for help with pressure, confidence, performance, conflict, exhaustion, or a sense of being stuck. But very often, beneath the presenting challenge, something deeper is moving.
The psyche is reorganising. The old leadership identity is loosening. A larger self is trying to emerge.
The Collective Unconscious: Leadership Is Never Only Personal
One of Jung’s most important ideas is the collective unconscious — the deeper layer of psyche that does not belong only to the individual, but carries universal human patterns, images, instincts, and symbolic structures.
In leadership, this matters more than we may realise.
A leader is never just “being themselves” in a neutral way. They are also stepping into ancient patterns of authority, power, protection, sacrifice, wisdom, conquest, service, exile, belonging, and transformation.
The boardroom may look modern, but the psychic field is old. Around every leader, archetypal expectations gather.
People want the leader to be strong.
They want the leader to know.
They want the leader to protect them from uncertainty.
They want the leader to carry hope, absorb anxiety, and make sense of the unknown.
That is a lot for one human being to carry. And if the leader is unconscious of these deeper forces, they can easily become trapped inside them. They may begin to perform the role of the all-knowing father, the heroic rescuer, the untouchable warrior, the visionary prophet, or the sacrificial servant.
At first, this may look like effective leadership. Over time, it becomes a prison.
Archetypes: The Hidden Patterns Leaders Live Through
Archetypes are not personality types. They are deeper symbolic patterns that shape how human beings experience life. In leadership, archetypes often appear as inner postures.
- The Warrior pushes through.
- The King or Queen holds order.
- The Caregiver carries others.
- The Sage searches for truth.
- The Magician transforms systems.
- The Hero confronts danger.
- The Orphan fears abandonment.
- The Trickster disrupts certainty.
None of these patterns is wrong. Each has value. A leader may need the Warrior to make difficult decisions, the Sage to see clearly, the Caregiver to protect the human fabric of the organisation, and the Magician to imagine what does not yet exist.
The problem begins when one archetypal pattern takes over.
- A leader possessed by the Warrior may keep fighting long after the battle is over.
- A leader possessed by the Caregiver may over-function until resentment builds.
- A leader possessed by the Hero may secretly need a crisis in order to feel alive.
- A leader possessed by the Sage may hide in analysis when action is required.
- A leader possessed by the King may confuse authority with control.
This is one of the quiet dangers of leadership success. The archetype that helped a leader rise can become the very pattern that limits them later.
- The brave founder who built the business through instinct and force may struggle to share power.
- The expert who gained authority through knowledge may struggle when uncertainty requires humility.
- The rescuer who became loved for always being available may struggle to let others grow.
Leadership transition, then, is not only about developing new skills. It is about recognising which archetypal pattern has been running the show.
The Persona: The Leadership Mask That Starts to Tighten
Jung used the word persona to describe the social mask — the face we develop to function in the world. Every leader needs a persona.
The role requires steadiness. Presence. Boundaries. Judgement. The ability to stand in front of others and carry responsibility even when one is privately unsure.
But the persona becomes dangerous when the leader forgets it is a mask. This is where many successful leaders quietly suffer. They have become very good at being “the leader”. So good, in fact, that they no longer know where the role ends and the person begins.
They know how to sound confident.
They know how to stay composed.
They know how to read the room.
They know how to carry the pressure.
They know how to say, “I’m fine,” even when something inside is fraying.
At some point, the persona starts to tighten. The leader may still be performing well externally, but inwardly there is a growing disconnection. The role that once gave shape now feels like a costume. The old identity begins to feel too small.
This is often where identity shift begins. Not as a dramatic breakdown, but as a private unease.
A sense of hollowness.
A loss of charge.
A subtle fatigue from being the version of oneself everyone expects.
Shadow Work: What the Leader Cannot Yet Admit
No leadership transition is complete without shadow work.
The shadow is made up of the parts of ourselves we disown, reject, hide, or fail to recognise. In leadership, the shadow is especially powerful because leaders are rewarded for having a strong, coherent identity.
They are expected to know who they are. But the stronger the leadership identity, the more carefully certain parts may have been pushed away.
- The decisive leader may have disowned doubt.
- The calm leader may have disowned anger.
- The generous leader may have disowned resentment.
- The strategic leader may have disowned vulnerability.
- The humble leader may have disowned ambition.
- The successful leader may have disowned fear.
The shadow does not disappear because it is ignored. It leaks.
It leaks into tone.
It leaks into decisions.
It leaks into impatience, avoidance, control, withdrawal, superiority, people-pleasing, cynicism, and sudden emotional reactions that seem larger than the moment requires.
A leader who has not met their shadow will often call it something else.
They may call control “high standards”.
They may call avoidance “giving people space”.
They may call fear “prudence”.
They may call resentment “fatigue”.
They may call ego “vision”.
They may call emotional distance “professionalism”.
Shadow work is not about shaming the leader. It is about making the unconscious conscious so that it no longer has to run the organisation from underneath the table.
This is difficult work. But it is also liberating.
When a leader can say, “There is a part of me that needs to be admired,” or “There is a part of me that is terrified of losing control,” or “There is a part of me that is angry from years of carrying too much,” then something shifts.
The leader becomes less possessed. More choice becomes available.
Individuation: Leadership Beyond Adaptation
Jung’s idea of individuation is often misunderstood. It does not mean becoming more individualistic. It does not mean becoming more self-centred. And it is not the same as self-improvement.
Individuation is the lifelong process of becoming more whole. For leaders, this means moving beyond the adapted self — the version of themselves that was built to survive, succeed, impress, protect, belong, or win approval.
This adapted self may be highly capable. It may have produced real achievement. It may have built companies, led teams, delivered results, and earned respect.
But it may not be the whole person. At a certain stage of leadership, the question changes.
Earlier, the question may have been:
“How do I succeed?”
Later, it becomes:
“What is success asking me to become?”
Earlier, the question may have been:
“How do I prove myself?”
Later, it becomes:
“What part of myself no longer needs proving?”
Earlier, the question may have been:
“How do I lead others?”
Later, it becomes:
“From where in myself am I leading?”
That is the individuating movement. It is the shift from role-based leadership to Self-rooted leadership.
The Self: The Deeper Centre of Leadership
In Jungian psychology, the Self is not the ego.
The ego is the conscious “I” — the part that chooses, plans, thinks, acts, and manages daily life. The Self is something larger: the deeper organising centre of the whole psyche.
In leadership terms, this distinction is crucial. Many leaders operate from a highly developed ego. They are competent, disciplined, articulate, responsible, and capable of making things happen. This is not a problem. A weak ego cannot lead well.
But ego alone is not enough for mature leadership.
Ego wants control.
The Self seeks wholeness.
Ego asks, “How do I stay in command?”
The Self asks, “What is trying to become whole here?”
Ego protects the identity.
The Self transforms it.
When a leader begins to orient towards the Self, leadership becomes less reactive and more spacious. The leader is still decisive, but not compulsively controlling. Still strong, but not armoured. Still ambitious, but not hollow. Still visible, but not trapped by the image.
This is the kind of leadership people feel before they can explain it. There is a different gravity to it. The leader no longer needs to dominate the room to hold it.
Active Imagination: Listening to the Inner Organisation
One of the practices associated with Jung’s work is active imagination.
At its simplest, active imagination is a disciplined way of engaging with the unconscious. Instead of merely analysing a feeling, image, dream, or inner conflict, the person enters into dialogue with it.
For leaders, this can be incredibly powerful — not as fantasy, but as a way of listening to the inner organisation. Because every leader has an inner organisation.
There may be a Controller, a Pleaser, a Visionary, a Tired One, a Fighter, a Doubter, a Child, a Judge, a Protector, a Rebel, a Wise Elder. These are not literal people inside the leader, but symbolic expressions of psychic forces. A leader facing transition might ask:
- What part of me is resisting this next step?
- What part of me is exhausted?
- What part of me still believes I must carry everything alone?
- What part of me fears becoming irrelevant?
- What part of me knows the truth but has not been allowed to speak?
Active imagination allows these parts to become visible.
The point is not to obey every inner voice. The point is to bring unconscious material into conscious relationship. Once a part can be heard, it does not need to sabotage from the shadows.
This is where leadership development goes beyond performance coaching.
It becomes inner dialogue.
Inner integration.
Inner governance.
The leader learns to lead the inner system before trying to lead the outer one.
Symbolic Life: Why Leaders Need More Than Strategy
Jung believed modern people suffer when they lose symbolic life. This matters deeply in leadership.
Many leaders live in a world of strategy decks, metrics, financial targets, operating models, dashboards, and execution plans. These things are needed. They are necessary. But they do not fully nourish the human being.
A leader without symbolic life may become efficient but dry.
They may achieve, but not feel meaning.
They may perform, but not feel rooted.
They may influence, but not feel connected to something larger.
Symbolic life is the capacity to experience meaning through image, story, ritual, metaphor, dreams, art, myth, place, body, and inner pattern.
In leadership transition, symbolic life becomes essential because identity does not shift through logic alone.
A leader may understand intellectually that they need to let go of control, but something deeper may still cling to the old identity. A symbol can reach where explanation cannot.
The dying king.
The empty boardroom.
The bridge at dusk.
The armour that no longer fits.
The child behind the executive desk.
The old house with unopened rooms.
The fire that destroys and purifies.
These images are not decorative. They are ways the psyche communicates change.
When leaders recover symbolic life, they begin to see their transition differently. They stop asking only, “What should I do?” and begin asking, “What is this moment asking of me?”
That is a different quality of leadership inquiry.
Leadership Transition as Descent and Return
The deeper pattern in Jung’s Red Book is descent and return. Jung does not simply think his way into a new identity. He descends into the unconscious, meets figures and forces he does not control, wrestles with meaning, and returns with a changed understanding of the psyche. Leadership transition often follows a similar pattern.
- First, the old identity begins to fail.
- Then the leader enters uncertainty.
- Then shadow material rises.
- Then forgotten parts ask to be included.
- Then the leader must endure not knowing.
- Then a larger organising centre begins to form.
This is why leadership identity shift cannot be rushed. It is not a rebrand. It is not a mindset tweak. It is an inner reorganisation.
And if the leader tries to skip the descent, the transition remains superficial. They may change language, posture, strategy, or title, but the old pattern keeps operating beneath the surface.
The real work is to go down far enough to discover what has been unconsciously leading. Only then can the leader return differently.
The Future Leader: Internally Integrated, Not Merely Externally Effective
The future of leadership will demand more than competence. Competence is required, of course. But competence without inner integration can become brittle, defensive, and performative.
The leaders we need now are not only those who can manage complexity externally, but those who can meet complexity internally.
- Leaders who know when an archetype has taken over.
- Leaders who can recognise their shadow before it becomes culture.
- Leaders who understand that their persona is useful but not ultimate.
- Leaders who can listen to symbolic material without becoming inflated by it.
- Leaders who can act from the ego without being trapped inside it.
- Leaders who are willing to be shaped by the deeper Self.
This is not soft work. It may be some of the hardest work a leader ever does. Because it asks them to loosen the very identity that made them successful.
But this is also where leadership becomes more human, more grounded, and more alive. The leader’s real transition is not only into a bigger role. It is into a larger relationship with the Self.
And from there, leadership is no longer merely a performance of authority. It becomes an expression of wholeness.
I work with senior leaders navigating exactly this kind of transition — where the identity that got them here has stopped being enough. If that’s where you are, I’d be glad to talk.
Follow me on LinkedIn
Also read:
The Leaders’ Deeper Challenges
Personal Challenges Senior Leaders Face: Effectiveness & Identity Transition
